Agricultural intensification has fed the world, but are we healthier?
- Published on
Grow more food on less land? Agricultural intensification has intuitive appeal. The Earth has a growing human population to feed, and few new places to cultivate crops without further threatening its dwindling biodiversity.
The ‘Green Revolution’ of the 1960s delivered breakthroughs in technology that paved the way for an incredibly productive monocropping system. Improved varieties of wheat, rice and maize – using inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, machinery and irrigation became the cultivation norm. Farmers could now produce cereal crops that fed billions of people.
In a new article in Global Food Security, Ickowitz and her co-authors identify and explore one issue that intensification has been unable to solve: dietary quality. Unlike the incredible acceleration of calorie production, the nutritional quality of our diets hasn’t kept the same pace. And in many cases, has deteriorated. Globally two billion adults are overweight or obese – in contrast to the 800 million people that go hungry…
“The best scenario is for developing countries to jump ahead- and not mirror Western diets.”
The post Agricultural intensification has fed the world, but are we healthier? appeared first on CIFOR Forests News.
FoodSTART+ featured in the latest iMPACT magazine issue22.04.19
- Food Security
FoodSTART+ Principal Investigator, Diego Naziri, and CIAT Market Access Specialist, Brice Even share…Read more
IFPRI/A4NH at the Purdue Global Hunger Colloquium: Policy innovation is key to accelerating progress22.04.19
- Food Security
Leading figures in the global fight against hunger gathered at Purdue University April 10-11 for…Read more
EARTH DAY: Can Sumatran elephants and people coexist?22.04.19
Palembang, Indonesia – Present day South Sumatra looks a lot different from its heyday as…Read more