Yes, eating meat affects the environment, but cows are not killing the climate
As the scale and impacts of climate change become increasingly alarming, meat is a popular target for action. Advocates urge the public to eat less meat to save the environment. Some activists have called for taxing meat to reduce consumption of it.
A key claim underlying these arguments holds that globally, meat production generates more greenhouse gases than the entire transportation sector. However, this claim is demonstrably wrong, as I will show. And its persistence has led to false assumptions about the linkage between meat and climate change.
My research focuses on ways in which animal agriculture affects air quality and climate change. In my view, there are many reasons for either choosing animal protein or opting for a vegetarian selection. However, foregoing meat and meat products is not the environmental panacea many would have us believe. And if taken to an extreme, it also could have harmful nutritional consequences.
A sustainable future for people and nature? It's still possible12.11.18
Climate change, declining air and water quality, rapid population growth – it can seem overwhelmin…Read more
Where are the public education campaigns about climate change?09.11.18
When the HIV/AIDS epidemic became recognized as a serious threat to public health, there were…Read more
Peatlands: From marginal lands to essential ecosystem07.11.18
Peatlands, natural areas of the accumulated decayed plant material known as peat, have huge importan…Read more