Yes, eating meat affects the environment, but cows are not killing the climate
As the scale and impacts of climate change become increasingly alarming, meat is a popular target for action. Advocates urge the public to eat less meat to save the environment. Some activists have called for taxing meat to reduce consumption of it.
A key claim underlying these arguments holds that globally, meat production generates more greenhouse gases than the entire transportation sector. However, this claim is demonstrably wrong, as I will show. And its persistence has led to false assumptions about the linkage between meat and climate change.
My research focuses on ways in which animal agriculture affects air quality and climate change. In my view, there are many reasons for either choosing animal protein or opting for a vegetarian selection. However, foregoing meat and meat products is not the environmental panacea many would have us believe. And if taken to an extreme, it also could have harmful nutritional consequences.
AfDB-TAAT promotes trailblazing hybrid rice technology adapted to Africa16.08.19
- Creating JOBS and GROWTH
- Securing PUBLIC HEALTH
- Sustaining FOOD AVAILABILITY
16 August 2019, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. The Rice Compact of the African Development Bank-funded …Read more
Thomson Reuters: It’s time to look underground for climate resilience in sub-Saharan Africa15.08.19
A recent study sheds new light on the climate-groundwater relationship, finding that the 2015-2016 E…Read more
IPSNews.net: Is India on Track to Beat the Perfect Storm?13.08.19
“Those of us who work on water issues in (the global) South understand that there…Read more