Yes, eating meat affects the environment, but cows are not killing the climate
- From
-
Published on
30.10.18
- Impact Area


Frank M. Mitloehner, University of California, Davis
As the scale and impacts of climate change become increasingly alarming, meat is a popular target for action. Advocates urge the public to eat less meat to save the environment. Some activists have called for taxing meat to reduce consumption of it.
A key claim underlying these arguments holds that globally, meat production generates more greenhouse gases than the entire transportation sector. However, this claim is demonstrably wrong, as I will show. And its persistence has led to false assumptions about the linkage between meat and climate change.
My research focuses on ways in which animal agriculture affects air quality and climate change. In my view, there are many reasons for either choosing animal protein or opting for a vegetarian selection. However, foregoing meat and meat products is not the environmental panacea many would have us believe. And if taken to an extreme, it also could have harmful nutritional consequences.

Related news
-
CGIAR and national plant protection organizations strengthen collaboration for healthier forage landscapes in eastern and southern Africa
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)15.07.25-
Adaptation
Speaking at the opening session of the regional forage disease workshop held in Addis Ababa,…
Read more -
-
How climate-induced conflict is shaping rural Nigeria
Food Frontiers and Security Science Program14.07.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
VoxDev Article Jeffrey Bloem, Amy Damon, David Francis, Harrison Mitchell As climate change stretche…
Read more -
-
Multifunctional Landscapes that Incentivize Green Innovations and Improve Livelihoods
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program10.07.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Thriving Landscapes, Vibrant Futures Blog Series #2 Sustainable landscape transformation will not …
Read more -