Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- Published on
REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Women at work14.08.18
Nepal - Nestled in Nepal’s southern subtropical Terai lowlands, Chitwan National Park looks worlds…Read more
Trade conflict is a lose-lose game (China Daily)14.08.18
- Food Security
China Daily published an op-ed authored by IFPRI's Director General Shenggen Fan on impact of tr…Read more
Deadly African swine fever arrives in China, the world’s largest producer of pigs14.08.18
Africa swine fever, which recently appeared in Shenyang City, in Liaoning Province, northeastern Chi…Read more