Telescoping error in recalled food consumption: Evidence from a survey experiment in Ethiopia
-
From
CGIAR Initiative on Sustainable Healthy Diets
-
Published on
30.11.22
- Impact Area

To enable a transition towards healthier diets, it is important to first understand what people eat. But almost any method of learning about consumption patterns relies on a survey respondent’s ability to remember what they and others in their family ate. Whether people overestimate or underestimate their food consumption, it can be equally problematic for researchers. A recent paper published in the World Bank Economic Review looks at a particular kind of error in food consumption surveys called telescoping which affects the patterns found in consumption survey data.
Telescoping errors occur when survey respondents recall an event but their memory of the date of the event is inaccurate. In food consumption surveys, this means a respondent may report that their family ate eggs last week, but it might have been that they last ate eggs eight days ago, which fell out of the seven-day reference period. One way to correct telescoping errors is a two-visit interview format. Researchers recently conducted a survey experiment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, to measure the extent of telescoping bias on food consumption measures. More than 900 households were randomly assigned to a two-visit bounded recall – where they were asked about their consumption of 128 food items since the last visit by the survey team member – or a single visit unbounded recall – where they were asked about the consumption of the same 128 food items during the past seven days.
Results from the experiment found that the average value of reported food consumption was 16 percent higher in the unbounded single visit recall compared to the two-visit bounded recall. The research team found that most of the difference was explained in reported spending on less frequently consumed, protein-rich foods. It is likely that food security indicators based on household dietary diversity measures are overstated with unbounded recalls.
The results have implications for how the development community measures progress towards goals related to poverty, food insecurity, and social inequality. The full paper and other recent and relevant publications from Ethiopia by researchers from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) are available here.
The CGIAR Initiative on Sustainable Healthy Diets through Food Systems Transformation (SHiFT) combines high-quality nutritional and social science research capacity with development partnerships to generate innovative, robust solutions that contribute to healthier, more sustainable dietary choices and consumption of sustainable healthy diets. It builds on CGIAR’s unparalleled track record of agricultural research for development, including ten years of work on food systems and nutrition under the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH), particularly under the research flagship Food Systems for Healthier Diets.
Header image: Pedestrians walking in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Photo by Natasha Elkington/CIFOR from Flickr.
Related news
-
What’s really in our food? A global Look at Food Composition Databases—and the Gaps We Need to Fix
The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)13.06.25-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Nutrition, health & food security
To build healthier food systems, we need better food data. A new research shows where…
Read more -
-
New special issue of Food Policy examines fertilizer and soil health policies in the wake of global crises
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)12.06.25-
Food security
Press Release June 12, 2025 In the wake of overlapping global crises of the recent…
Read more -
-
Beyond Emergency Relief: Rethinking Humanitarian Response in Sudan
Ibukun Taiwo11.06.25-
Food security
This post is the second in a two-part series on Sudan’s overlapping food, water, and…
Read more -