Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
From Traditions to Triumph: Premalata’s Success with Solar-Dried Fish in Odisha
WorldFish09.10.25-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Premalata Behera, a 40-year-old member of Maa Women Self Help Group and resident of the…
Read more -
-
ICRISAT Brings Frontier Agricultural Science to the Caribbean in Landmark Partnership
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)03.10.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The world’s premier institute for dryland agriculture and a globally acclaimed research center, th…
Read more -
-
From Door-to-Door Sales to Aquaculture Leader in Zambia.
WorldFish30.09.25-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
In 2003, with just 1,250 kwacha in hand, Cosmas Chachi began walking from house to…
Read more -