Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
From Demonstration to Scaling for Impact: Driving Food Systems Transformation through Innovation in Malawi.
International Water Management Institute (IWMI)25.06.25-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The CGIAR delegation recently took part in the Climate-Resilient Innovation Marketplace and Food Sys…
Read more -
-
Strengthening the Capacity of Rice Farmers – A Step Towards Rice Self-Sufficiency and Food Security in Comoros
AfricaRice23.06.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
In the Union of the Comoros, agriculture is the backbone of rural livelihoods—but food insecurity…
Read more -
-
Raising productivity and profits, How AgWise is Closing Yield Gaps through AI
Sehlule Muzata20.06.25-
Adaptation
-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health
-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Nairobi, 20 June 2025 (IITA) - Across Africa smallholder farmers battle working with degraded soils,…
Read more -