Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area
REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
Empowering women in business through improved chicken in Tanzanian
Eisen Bernard Bernardo07.11.25-
Adaptation
-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
In the coastal villages of Tanzania's Lindi region, where the sun warms the earth year-round,…
Read more -
-
SBI Foundation Joins Hands with UAS Raichur and ICRISAT to Launch “SMART-CROP” Initiative
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)29.10.25-
Big data
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
SBI Foundation, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) arm of the State Bank of India, has…
Read more -
-
Can the Southern Mediterranean Fish Value Chain Thrive Without Women’s Empowerment?
WorldFish22.10.25-
Gender equality
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
When you picture the Mediterranean’s blue economy—encompassing its vibrant fisheries and aquacul…
Read more -