Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
Liberia Showcases Climate-Resilient Rice Varieties to Boost National Food Security
AfricaRice02.05.25-
Gender equality, youth & social inclusion
-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Suakoko, Bong County, Liberia — In a significant stride toward bolstering Liberia’s food and nut…
Read more -
-
Inclusive Delivery unpacks pathways to strengthen seed systems for smallholder farmers
CGIAR Initiative on Seed Equal29.04.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
At an engaging side event hosted by CGIAR’s Breeding for Tomorrow Science Program, stakeholders fr…
Read more -
-
Over 1,000 Farmers in Kenya’s Semi-Arid Regions Trained in Climate-Smart Innovations
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)08.04.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The Accelerating Impacts of CGIAR Climate Research for Africa (AICCRA) project is transforming far…
Read more -