Where REDD+ money goes – and doesn’t go
- From
-
Published on
05.06.18
- Impact Area

REDD+ financing’s annual average of USD 323 million might sound like a lot on its own, but compare this to the 41 billion spent on agricultural subsidies and biofuel, and it’s just a drop in the bucket.
This is one of many findings elucidated in a forthcoming study on funding for reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). The study was led by the international consulting group COWI, along with the Öko-Institut and scientists from the Center for the International Forestry Research (CIFOR). The team studied REDD+ funding from 2008–2015 to see where it went and how it was spent. Read the full story on Forests News.
Related news
-
Uganda’s agriculture ministry adopts PigSmart resources to train extension workers
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)29.08.25-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The Uganda Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industries and Fisheries (MAAIF) has adopted PigSmart pla…
Read more -
-
Mapping Kenya’s livestock routes: The arteries of dryland pastoral economy
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)29.08.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Kenya has taken a landmark step in strengthening its livestock sector and advancing regional integra…
Read more -
-
ICRISAT Champions Climate-Resilient, Nutrition-Secure Agriculture at M.S. Swaminathan Centenary International Conference
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)13.08.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The Prof. M.S. Swaminathan Centenary International Conference, held in New Delhi from 7–9 August 2…
Read more -