Can you trust the numbers?
- From
-
Published on
17.06.19
- Impact Area
Millions of dollars are being invested in efforts to reduce the contribution of tropical deforestation to climate change. To find out whether that money is being well-spent, decision-makers choose from a variety of ways to measure avoided deforestation. But which one can be trusted? New research has found that different methods are more accurate in different sites, depending on the local deforestation drivers and the circumstances of the country.
REDD+, the UN-backed scheme aiming to compensate developing countries for reducing deforestation and forest degradation – is now more than a decade old, and several tropical countries, including Indonesia and Brazil will receive payments for results achieved.
Since some of the early REDD+ action was at the local level – with over 300 projects still active – it is important to understand if these initiatives contributed to reducing deforestation, and by how much. But what is the best way to measure that?
A new study…
Read the rest of the story at forestsnews.org
The post Can you trust the numbers? appeared first on CIFOR Forests News.
Related news
-
CGIAR Climate Security team pilots a new research approach for the development of Nature-based Solutions in fragile settings
Ibukun Taiwo27.11.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
Responding to complex crises requires new systemic research approaches that help identify entry poin…
Read more -
-
From Dirt to Decision-Making: Governance and Soil Health Must Go Hand in Hand
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program26.11.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
In October, the world convened in Des Moines for the 2025 Borlaug Dialogue under the…
Read more -
-
Drones prove their worth in measuring livestock methane in Africa
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)26.11.25-
Mitigation
In May 2024, the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and partners shared news of the…
Read more -