Can you trust the numbers?
- From
-
Published on
17.06.19
- Impact Area

Millions of dollars are being invested in efforts to reduce the contribution of tropical deforestation to climate change. To find out whether that money is being well-spent, decision-makers choose from a variety of ways to measure avoided deforestation. But which one can be trusted? New research has found that different methods are more accurate in different sites, depending on the local deforestation drivers and the circumstances of the country.
REDD+, the UN-backed scheme aiming to compensate developing countries for reducing deforestation and forest degradation – is now more than a decade old, and several tropical countries, including Indonesia and Brazil will receive payments for results achieved.
Since some of the early REDD+ action was at the local level – with over 300 projects still active – it is important to understand if these initiatives contributed to reducing deforestation, and by how much. But what is the best way to measure that?
A new study…
Read the rest of the story at forestsnews.org
The post Can you trust the numbers? appeared first on CIFOR Forests News.
Related news
-
ICRISAT celebrates World IP Day, forging new partnership with BITS Pilani
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)25.04.25-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
In the lead-up to World Intellectual Property Day (26 April), the International Crops Research Ins…
Read more -
-
Progress and challenges in implementing non-market approaches
Climate Action Science Program23.04.25-
Adaptation
-
Mitigation
To date, more than 20 organizations are registered as support providers to implement non-market appr…
Read more -
-
How Conflict-Sensitive Water Management Builds Peace: Lessons from CGIAR’s Training with Egypt’s NWRC
Ibukun Taiwo22.04.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
Climate change is straining water supplies and heightening community tensions. Evidence shows that w…
Read more -