Poverty Reduction, Livelihoods, and Jobs

Food systems can help to effectively address poverty reduction, livelihoods, and jobs. With the right policies, investments, and research, they can stimulate economic growth and promote social inclusion.
Yet an estimated 692 million people fell below the International Poverty Line of USD 2.15 per person per day in 2024, the measure used by the World Bank to measure absolute poverty globally. With investment in critical areas like technology, infrastructure, and market access, food systems can achieve their potential and provide solutions to systemic challenges, including youth unemployment, low incomes, gender disparities, and other inequalities.
(At the I-Youth Agripreneurs training), the first thing that caught my attention was the different value chains in agriculture …The project paid us a transport allowance during the training, so I told myself I would use that as my first investment in business. I started posting pictures of our classes and people got interested and asked me “How much is your fish?”
Before the course ended, I had started producing fish. I started with 20 kilograms of catfish. That was my first business …and within a week, I had finished selling it. It encouraged me to do more and more, and as we speak now, I produce over 500 kg of catfish in a month.”
Recommendations
for Decision-Makers
- Make poverty reduction a higher priority both as an end in itself and in the pursuit of shifting broader global and national priorities, such as climate change adaptation and mitigation. Poverty is one of the leading causes of poor diets and food insecurity.
- As part of efforts to reduce rural poverty, tap into rising food demand from the rapid demographic shift towards urban centers. Opportunities include raising farm incomes, improving opportunities for high-value enterprises needed for viable small-scale farms, and creating new business and job opportunities in extended supply chains, with the support of added investment into infrastructure such as electricity, transport, and storage.
- Partner with the private sector to stimulate jobs, entrepreneurship opportunities, and investments, especially in rural areas. Economic growth is a critical engine of continuing change in food systems in low- and middle-income countries, potentially driving down poverty.
- Invest in capacity building and infrastructure in evolving technologies and institutional innovations as a tool for poverty alleviation. For example, digital agriculture tools, powered by AI and remote sensing, can deliver critical market, weather, and financial information directly to farmers, improving decision-making and stabilizing incomes, when supported by policies that ensure equitable participation in the digital transition.
- Ensure regulatory frameworks that govern seed systems promote rather than hinder the increased availability of high-quality, disease-free, and affordable seeds and animals to smallholders, and engage rural communities in breeding programs to increase access to these resources and to stimulate jobs and enterprise, especially in remote rural populations.
Challenges
Uneven Distribution
83.2% of the world’s poor people live in sub-Saharan Africa (553 million) and South Asia (402 million) (UNDP, 2024).
Rural populations – especially smallholder and subsistence farmers, fisherfolk, pastoralists, and forest-dependent communities – are particularly vulnerable. Many lack access to essential resources like land, training, financial services, and decent employment opportunities.
Cost of Sustainability
Climate change exacerbates poverty, and poverty makes communities more vulnerable to climate impacts.
Aligning poverty reduction with sustainable agricultural practices has upfront costs of green technologies and conservation measures. These are often prohibitive for small-scale farmers, despite national and regional policy commitments to promote sustainable farming.
Limited Career Pathways
20% of young people lack access to employment, education, or training (WEF, 2024).
Agriculture is often viewed as an unappealing and unsustainable career, leading to significant youth migration to urban areas.
Gender Inequalities
Women, who play a vital role within agrifood systems, face deeply entrenched inequities. Their work is more likely to be informal, low-skilled, and laborintensive, and women in waged employment earn just 82 cents for every dollar earned by men.
These disparities perpetuate cycles of poverty and exclusion (FAO, 2023).
What Food Systems Science Tells Us
Tackling poverty in low- and middle-income countries requires a combined effort that focuses on economic inclusion, promoting fairness, and protecting the environment. Agriculture and food systems are essential to this mission, as they support the livelihoods of millions of people across Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America.
Well-designed policies, strategic action, and targeted investments are crucial to increasing productivity and resilience and strengthening market systems. By empowering smallholder producers, these efforts boost food security, create jobs, reduce inequality, and promote long-term economic growth. Science plays a key role by helping decision-makers design policies that balance needs and consider both benefits and trade-offs across complex cross-sectoral agendas.
Sustainably improving agricultural productivity is the most effective way to reduce poverty and inequality while increasing incomes in low-income countries. For example, developing and promoting crop varieties, livestock breeds and fish species that are climate-resilient and locally adapted can create a buffer for farmers. For the millions of small producers who often depend on rainfall for irrigation and lack access to finance to invest in new technologies or infrastructure, these innovations can be game changers.
Science tells us that it is not enough for breeders to develop new climate-resilient options for farmers. They also need to consider local social, market, environmental, and regulatory factors to increase adoption by smallholders.
Inclusive and demand-led breeding programs can help address barriers to adoption while promoting gender equity, youth, and social inclusion. For instance, CGIAR’s Seeds for Needs program involves more than 50,000 farmers in 14 countries across Africa, Asia, and Central and South America. Farmers test, rank, and select crop varieties that best meet their needs and provide this critical feedback back to breeders. Considerations go beyond just yield, including traits valued by different stakeholders in a community, such as taste, market demand, and suitability for traditional recipes or processing qualities.
Regulations around seed production systems must empower farmers, not constrain them. Certified seeds (seeds with official documentation) from formal systems may be high-performing seeds but are often too expensive or hard to access for many farmers, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Informal seed systems, which many farmers rely on, should be supported through collaboration and regulatory changes. Governments have a strong role to play in developing policies that support innovation, protect local biodiversity, and empower farming communities. One example is enhancing the capacity of governments to enable the production of seed adapted to climate change, for instance, by taking a pragmatic approach to seed system regulation (Figure 22) and fostering collective bargaining through associations and cooperatives, such as the community livestock breeding programs.

Safety nets serve as targeted poverty reduction programs for many vulnerable populations like landless and low-income urban populations. They are also a way to reduce risks for farmers transitioning to new crops, livestock, or agricultural practices. Such changes can affect yields and market returns, making them difficult decisions for smallholder farmers, so it is not something done lightly. Examples include public procurement schemes, index-linked or picture-based crop insurance, and accessible microfinance packages.
At the production level, innovations can drive the growth of local agribusinesses, creating opportunities for women and young people. For instance, local seed businesses provide farmers with high-quality seeds and improved crop varieties, making these more accessible while offering new income streams. Examples include initiatives supporting rooted potato cuttings (Figure 23) in India and Kenya. Governments can play a key role by funding startup costs and offering business skills training and, more generally, by providing essential public goods such as good quality infrastructure, education, and health.
Along the supply chain, innovations that deliver better transport and storage for fresh produce, as well as value-added products like Vitamin A-rich orange-fleshed sweetpotato puree that have extended shelf lives can improve nutrition, health, and food security. These advancements help reduce waste and food loss and enable farmers to sell their products when prices are more favorable. The increasing populations of urban consumers who are typically cash-rich but time-poor tend to buy more perishable products including animal, fish, and horticultural produce as well as semi-prepared and processed foods. To support the growing distance between producers and consumers, strategic investments in infrastructure such as wholesale food markets are essential. Strengthening what is sometimes referred to as the ‘hidden middle’ of value chains expands opportunities for small and medium enterprises and plays a crucial role in sustaining small-scale farms in rural areas. Africa and Asia are predicted to see 90% of global urban population growth by 2050. Studies show that in sub-Saharan Africa, agriculture production and yields are correlated with proximity to urban markets when measured by travel time and cost.
Public-private partnerships are crucial for driving economic growth, creating jobs, and fostering innovation, including in research and development. For example, mobile money services like M-Pesa have improved financial inclusion for millions in rural areas. Phones also connect farmers to market information and advisory services, especially when supported by government investments in digital infrastructure.
In Brazil, Fome Zero, an incentive and investment program is leveraging its agricultural sector to reduce poverty and eradicate hunger, with cooperatives and private companies playing a critical role in rural areas. The Collaborative Breeding of Five Tropically Adapted Potato Varieties (TAP5) program also showcases how public and private collaboration can lead to practical solutions that benefit farmers.
However, expanding opportunities in agricultural systems does not automatically reduce poverty. Recognizing this is vital for agricultural research and food system development, yet it often receives little attention. Economic growth must be inclusive, and sustainable while ensuring decent work for all. CGIAR is currently working with the International Labor Organization (ILO) to highlight this issue, identify research gaps, and promote policies that support fair and decent work in food systems.
Questions and Answers:
What Do Decision-Makers Need?
During the consultation, four critical questions emerged where decision-makers felt further guidance was needed. Here, we present a menu of answers to give a flavor of some of the available options and to show how they can be adapted to diverse local, national, and regional contexts.
More options are available here.
Decision-Maker Question: “How can we leverage public-private partnerships to find the best bet innovations to help secure farmer livelihoods and economic growth?”
One Answer: More for less – doubling the productivity of crops, livestock, and fish in Africa

CGIAR, in partnership with national agricultural research institutes around the world, develops new and improved crop varieties that are resilient to climate change. But they do not always reach the farmers who need them. Challenges include ensuring enough of these seeds are made available and making that last-mile delivery to farmers, particularly to those who live in remote areas. The private sector can play a vital role in bridging these gaps by multiplying seed and using their distribution networks.
Harnessing the power of public-private partnerships is the premise behind Technologies for African Agricultural Transformation (TAAT). TAAT is a flagship program of the African Development Bank that brings together CGIAR, national and regional research centers, seed and fertilizer companies, and agribusinesses to deliver climate-resilient agricultural technologies at scale. It is part of an effort to lift 130 million people out of extreme poverty and end hunger and malnutrition across Africa by accelerating agricultural productivity. The initiative aims to reach more than 40 million farmers and double the productivity of crops, livestock, and fish.
Impacts include:
- Providing climate-resilient, disease-resistant, and nutrient-rich crop varieties to 10 million farming families in 28 countries, boosting food production by 12 million tons annually, worth USD 763 million.
- Streamlining regional seed and farm input regulations, speeding up the spread of agricultural technologies across countries to enhance the development of priority commodity seed systems across countries and Regional Economic Committees.
- Supporting agricultural policies, strengthening extension services, and engaging the private sector in value chains like rice, wheat, maize, beans, cassava, sorghum and millet, soybeans, sweetpotato, vegetables, fish, and small livestock.
- Training farmers in sustainable practices like soil and water management, youth agribusiness, and pest control, addressing challenges like the devastating maize insect pest fall armyworm.
- Promoting sound agricultural policies, strengthening extension systems, and increasing private sector engagement in selected important value chains, including rice, wheat, maize, sorghum and millet, beans, cassava, sweet potatoes, fish, small livestock, vegetables, and soybeans.
Which Decision-Makers Will Find This Useful?
Anyone working on issues around food and climate resilience. National and local policymakers such as those in Ministries of Environment, Agriculture, Rural Development and Finance, agribusinesses and cooperatives, national agricultural research and extension organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and development agencies.
Resources for Decision-Makers
E-catalogs
Designed to help government, development agencies, and private sector decision-makers find the innovations that best suit their needs.
App
TAAT Africa including a database of agricultural technologies with a description of their applicability
Knowledge Products
TAAT Knowledge Center – browse the briefs, catalogs, toolkits, pitches, reports, presentations, and other knowledge materials.
Contact
Chrysantus Akem
Coordinator TAAT Program Management Unit, CGIAR – International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
c.akem@cgiar.org
Decision-Maker Question: “How can we incentivize investment in the seeds that farmers want and need?”
One Answer: Boosting bean production through collaboration

Beans are highly nutritious, easy to grow, and good for soil health, making them a staple crop for smallholder farmers across the world. They provide essential dietary protein for more than 300 million people in sub-Saharan Africa. In terms of poverty alleviation, they significantly increase smallholder farmer incomes by up to 117% through resilience to climate change, increased market income, better quality seed, and more effective farm management practices. In Ethiopia, where almost 40% of the population lived in poverty in 2017, adopting improved beans reduced food insecurity by 44%. Studies have also found that the returns outweigh trade-offs such as land reallocation and investment in seed and training.
Yet while the case for beans is clear, yields are not reaching their full potential, meaning farmers miss out. This is primarily due to the use of low-yielding, recycled local seeds by most smallholder farmers rather than through the uptake of high-quality certified bean seed, for example, in Malawi. This low uptake, in turn, disincentivizes the formal sector to invest in producing quality seed.
To close this yield and investment gap, in 1996, CGIAR scientists brought together a range of public and private sector partners to form the Pan-African Bean Research Alliance (PABRA). Partners include National Agricultural Research Institutions, sub-regional organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), producer organizations, universities, farmers, the private sector, and donors.
So far, its work has led to the release of over 650 new bean varieties, in 31 African countries, which have helped more than 42.7 million farmers (58% of whom are women) feed their families, expand their businesses, and strengthen their communities with better beans. It also facilitates both local and export bean trade by working with a network of traders in different countries and supporting the dissemination of varieties demanded by national and regional markets. In 2022, Ethiopia’s exported beans were valued at USD 95 million from USD 8 million in 2004, in Tanzania, yellow bean exports were estimated at USD 27 million, while Uganda’s regional bean exports rose to USD 132 million from USD 10 million in 2010.
PABRA also collaborates with national and regional policymakers to harmonize and operationalize seed policies and regulations, leading to streamlined variety evaluation and registration processes, which encourage private sector investment. Production of both certified and quality-declared seed production (Figure 26) increased sixfold between 2021 and 2023. Early-generation seed production—the first set of seeds for planting or growing with qualities such as strong growth, resistance to disease, and high productivity—increased by 200%. This is helping to increase production while improving quality. On average, bean yields have doubled across the 31 member countries. This has translated to increased profitability—more than 5 million households in 10 African countries have seen a 30% increase in household income.
PABRA’s high-iron beans have even been incorporated into public procurement programs to reduce risks for farmers. For example, they have been added to school menus, helping reduce malnutrition among children. More than 275,000 school-age children (51% girls) in Tanzania, Rwanda, Uganda, Burundi, and Zimbabwe now regularly enjoy them in school feeding programs.
PABRA received the Africa Food Prize in 2023 and the ALSUMAIT Prize for African Development in 2019 in recognition of exceptional leadership in expanding and protecting the biodiversity of beans. PABRA research has led to smallholder farmers and their families using over 650 varieties of beans.
PABRA has not left behind the policymakers, so all the work fits very well with the policy framework the government has in promoting crops, which will contribute to the country’s growth, address malnutrition, and improve food security in the country.”
Which Decision-Makers Will Find This Useful?
National and local policymakers such as those in Ministries of Agriculture, Health, Trade and Industry, Environment, Finance and Climate Change, agribusinesses and cooperatives, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and development agencies.
Resources for Decision-Makers
Publication
Website
Contact
Jean Claude Rubyogo
Global Bean Program Leader & PABRA Director, CGIAR – Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
j.c.rubyogo@cgiar.org
Decision-Maker Question: “How can we stimulate rural job opportunities for young people and women?”
One Answer: New potato seed technologies increasing yields, jobs, and incomes in Asia and Africa
The potato sector is vital to rural economies in Africa and Asia, supporting food security and livelihoods for millions of people. In Kenya alone, it is of critical importance to the national economy and to the two million people who depend on its value chain for their livelihoods and food security.
In Kenya, potato yields average 8-15 tons per hectare, about half of what smallholder farmers could achieve with better inputs and farming practices. One major reason is that 800,000 Kenyan potato farmers lack access to quality seed. This means that they often recycle seed potatoes from earlier harvests or buy them from unregulated informal markets. This results in the widespread use of seed potatoes infested with pathogens or pests. Using high-quality seed potatoes can increase yields and incomes by as much as 50%, particularly when combined with farmer training on how to better manage seed recycling and soil health. This opens opportunities in seed production, marketing, and extension services, sectors where women and youth can thrive.
CGIAR and partners have worked to expand the supply of disease-free seed potatoes and make farmers aware of the importance of using them by investing in early seed generation. These are the first set of seeds for planting or growing that have good qualities, such as strong growth, resistance to disease, and high productivity. One way to do this is by using rooted apical cuttings.
Rooted apical cuttings are produced by taking small pieces from a healthy plant and placing them into soil-free media where they start to grow roots. This is done under controlled, sterile conditions to ensure they are disease-free. Each plantlet (the new plant that grows from the cutting) can then produce more than 100 identical rooted cuttings, which are supplied to seed producers who multiply them. Each cutting produces 10-20+ tubers, which, after a further round of multiplication, can be sold as certified seed to farmers (Figure 23).

Benefits of rooted apical cuttings include:
- As well as boosting quality seed supply, this technology is bringing new employment and entrepreneurship opportunities to farmers, in particular, women and young people in rural areas. Startup costs, land requirements, and risks are relatively low. This also reduces dependency on expensive local seed.
- Rooted apical cuttings multiply up to 20 times faster than conventional seed potatoes, decreasing costs and disease build-ups and increasing availability. They can be sold after just two seasons of multiplication compared to conventional multiplication, which takes three or four seasons.
- Conventional seed systems are centralized while rooted apical cuttings can be produced by independent nurseries, promoting employment and entrepreneurship opportunities including for young people and women, and reducing dependency on expensive local seed.
- A greenhouse (10 × 4 meters) producing 30,000–40,000 rooted apical cuttings per season, sold at USD 0.10–0.15 per cutting, can generate USD 3,000–5,000 per season in revenue. This setup can support 150–200 farmers, assuming each farmer plants 200 cuttings in the field, while yield gains in the field increase profits by USD 500–1,200 per hectare, potentially doubling net income within two to three seasons compared to using farm-saved seed.
- As the seed potatoes produced are early generation, farmers can save and recycle them over several seasons without a significant risk of losing quality, further saving costs.
Centers of Excellence, which are co-funded by projects and host farmers and are often privately owned are supporting this work by building capacity for early-generation seed production including in Kenya and Nigeria. The use of apical cuttings is spreading in India, Kenya, Mali, Uganda, Rwanda, Cameroon, Viet Nam, and the Philippines, while Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique, Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, Nepal, and Bhutan have expressed interest in the method.
I started with a 50-kilogram bag of seed potatoes, and I saw my yield increase by 280%. Then I took training to produce my own clean seed from cuttings. Now I make a good living selling seed in my community and I am training other farmers on how to become seed producers.”
Which Decision-Makers Will Find This Useful?
National ministries responsible for agriculture, youth and employment, gender equality, trade and industry, and finance as well as local economic and development entities and regional agricultural offices. Seed producers, agribusinesses and cooperatives, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and development agencies, as well as financial institutions looking for high-return investments in sustainable scalable agricultural solutions, and retail chains and farm input suppliers.
Resources for Decision-Makers
Contact
Kalpana Sharma
Senior Scientist, CGIAR – International Potato Center (CIP)
kalpana.sharma@cgiar.org
Decision-Maker Question: “How can we reverse fisheries decline while supporting the incomes of those who depend on them for their livelihoods?”
One Answer: Community-based fisheries management in the Philippines and Solomon Islands
Community-based fisheries management (CBFM) is an approach that can help protect rural livelihoods while also conserving the biodiversity of aquatic systems. The approach is particularly suitable to geographically isolated environments where central fisheries agencies may struggle to reach with regular services or monitoring of fisheries regulations.
CBFM builds on local institutions and collective action for managing fisheries. Where governments are supporting the CBFM process, the focus is often on strengthening community ownership of fisheries management through participatory diagnosis (communities and experts work together to identify problems and solutions) and adaptive management (communities adjust their fishing practices based on results and new information). The goal is to empower the community to manage resources sustainably and conserve natural wealth for their prosperity in the future. It has also been shown to significantly increase annual fish production and household incomes while enabling improved access to finance.
Fishing employs millions of rural people worldwide while also contributing to their nutrition and food security. Large bodies of water and fisheries are generally resources that people share. Yet unsustainable fishing practices put these resources under pressure. Globally, it has been demonstrated that overfishing and its resulting income losses are directly related to ineffective governance.
CBFM has value in a wide range of circumstances, from wetlands and bodies of freshwater to coastal and ocean resources. CGIAR has worked with many partners to capture the benefits of CBFM for their countries.
In the Philippines, problems with fisheries began to emerge in the 1980s. With coastal fish production decreasing year on year, the government took action. Among a range of approaches, there was a strong focus on CBFM. Since then, there has been extensive investment in CBFM projects in the country. Like in other countries, CBFM has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on equity and sustainable management of fisheries in the Philippines.
In the Solomon Islands, the government has identified CBFM as the principal strategy to address threats to ecosystems and ocean-based livelihoods. The National Fisheries Policy 2019–2029 recognizes CBFM as the way forward for managing marine resources, and the Community-Based Coastal and Marine Resource Management Strategy 2021-2025 serves as the guide for all CBRM practitioners in the country.
Strengthening national services has been found to be a cost-effective approach to scale CBFM: In 18 months fisheries officers delivered information and awareness on CBRM to 96 communities at a total operating cost of USD 51,000 (USD 531 per community).
CBFM initiatives have led to the development of management plans that support the sustainability of local economies. Over the past 15 years, the number of communities engaging in CBFM has grown from a handful to around 400, indicating widespread adoption and potential cumulative benefits for poverty alleviation. CGIAR, working with Solomon Islands Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources (MFMR), The Pacific Community, and other organizations, has contributed to planning and implementing CBFM, including capacity building for Provincial Fisheries Officers.

Which Decision-Makers Will Find This Useful?
National and local policymakers such as those in Ministries of Environment, Fisheries, Agriculture and Finance. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), development agencies and community leadership. Entities in pursuit of progress towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Resources for Decision-Makers
Training Package
Contact
Grace Orirana
Research Fellow, CGIAR – WorldFish
g.orirana@cgiar.org
Looking Ahead

Global priorities are increasingly shifting toward addressing environmental challenges, often overshadowing efforts to reduce poverty. Added to these pressures are geopolitical instability, conflicts, and natural disasters, which are increasing the number of forcibly displaced people. These include refugees, asylum seekers, and internally displaced people such as those who have lost their homes due to conflict or disaster. Their number is estimated to exceed 110 million as of May 2023. These issues dominate public and government attention because of their severe risks to humanity, prompting nations to sideline efforts on long-term poverty alleviation as they respond to short-term crises.
Although efforts to reduce poverty and increase food and nutrition security have made headway, progress is often slow leading to decision-maker frustration and fatigue. Furthermore, connected challenges such as climate change, the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, and ongoing conflicts threaten to erode or even reverse these gains. In sub-Saharan Africa, economic growth remains too low to meaningfully reduce poverty, with projections that average income growth per capita will only reach 1.2% over 2023-2024 (World Bank, 2023). Furthermore, nearly 455 million people in conflict-prone countries live in poverty (UNDP, 2024). These realities underline the continuing urgent need to prioritize poverty alleviation in national and global strategies.
Climate change impacts poverty, while poverty limits people’s ability to adapt to its effects. Agricultural research and investment should prioritize crops, livestock, and aquatic species that meet the needs of the most food-insecure populations, including developing climate-resilient varieties of root, tuber, and banana crops that also improve diet quality and nutrition through higher and more stable incomes. Foods from water, which include diverse animals, plants, and microorganisms, all of which are important for consumption, also hold the potential to play important roles in terms of food and livelihood security at times of shortages.
New technologies have great potential to reduce poverty, particularly in food systems. Digital tools such as those powered by AI and remote sensing can provide farmers with critical market, weather, and financial information, helping them make better decisions and stabilize incomes. However, infrastructure gaps, along with limited digital skills, risk excluding vulnerable populations, especially in rural areas. Governments must invest in digital infrastructure and the related institutional environments to improve access to these tools and provide training in their use while maintaining traditional support services to ensure no one is left behind.
The growth in urban markets presents an opportunity to create employment opportunities across food systems and help sustain small-scale rural farms when supported by investments in infrastructure and innovations that better connect producers with more distant consumers. It is also creating a shift in consumer demand towards high-value, perishable, and processed food products, which can provide opportunities for entrepreneurship and jobs along the food chain.
To create food systems that work for the poorest, policies must prioritize stable and fair market prices, supported by social safety nets. These measures can reduce the costs of sustainable production, lower market risks, and provide farmers with more predictable incomes. These measures can offset the costs of integrating environmental and social externalities into production systems, reduce market volatility, and enhance predictability for farmers. Governments must also support risk management mechanisms to protect against climate-related and market shocks.
Finally, addressing gender inequality and youth inclusion is crucial to reducing poverty. Women are disproportionately affected by poverty and food insecurity, yet they play a critical role in food systems. Targeted measures, such as improving access to land, credit, and information for women and children, can substantially enhance productivity and income stability for rural households.
One of the main barriers is the gap in communication between the scientist and the private sector, including the farmer who is supposed to be the key beneficiary of the materials and innovations the scientists are coming up with.”
