Why gender-sensitive social protection is critical to the COVID-19 response in low- and middle-income countries
- From
-
Published on
28.04.20
- Impact Area

The COVID-19 pandemic and restrictions on movement to control the spread of infection are having profound impacts on the income and daily lives of people in low- and middle-income countries, particularly the poor. Governments and donors are responding by expanding social protection programs. Melissa Hidrobo, Neha Kumar, Tia Palermo, Amber Peterman, and Shalini Roy describe how the current crisis is also affecting gender relations, and why attention to gender in implementing expanded social protection programs is critical. They provide specific advice and propose actions to minimize harm during the crisis response period—and to ensure that longer-term gains in gender equity and empowerment can be maintained and built-upon post-crisis.—John McDermott, series co-editor and Director, CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH).
Many governments are using social protection programs to respond to the economic crisis and health risk induced by COVID-19. As of April 17, 133 countries had adapted or introduced 564 social protection initiatives, according to the World Bank. With the focus on rapid assistance, gender considerations have understandably not been at the forefront of these efforts. A rapid assessment of initial COVID-19 social protection responses indicates that only 11% show some (albeit limited) gender-sensitivity.
This is unsurprising—most existing social protection programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are either gender-blind or neutral at best—but it is worrying. The COVID-19 crisis has the potential to widen gender inequalities, including those related to loss of livelihoods, reproductive health risks, disproportionate burden of care, and violence against women and children. Social protection that does not take gender into account can reinforce these inequalities.
Photo credit: Stockpexel/Shutterstock
This blog post is part of a special series of analyses on the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on national and global food and nutrition security, poverty, and development. The blog series is edited by IFPRI director general Johan Swinnen and A4NH director John McDermott. See the full series here.
Related news
-
Building Bridges for Resilient Landscapes – MFL Collaboration with Zim AEKN
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program29.09.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Gender equality
Reflections on “Deepening the Development of the Zimbabwe Agroecology Knowledge Network (Zim AEKN)…
Read more -
-
Empowering Women in Agriculture: AKILIMO's Journey Towards Gender-Responsive Advisory Services
Sehlule Muzata29.09.25-
Adaptation
-
Food security
-
Gender equality
This article summarizes a presentation titled "Insights on Gender Dimensions in the Use and Uptake…
Read more -
-
Regenerative Agriculture for Healthy Diets and Resilient Food Systems: Better Diets and Nutrition@Stockholm Forum 2025
Esha Sarswat26.09.25-
Environmental health
-
Food security
-
Health
-
Nutrition
-
Nutrition, health & food security
At Stockholm Food Forum 2025, a side event will spotlight how regenerative agriculture, and agroec…
Read more -