Monitoring safeguards at the community-level: are we delivering good or bad change?
- From
-
Published on
02.06.20
- Impact Area

Imagine this scenario: an indigenous people’s organization (IPO) in the Philippines withdrawing its participation in an environmental project. The organization decides to never receive, in whichever form, any assistance from any development organization because members believe that their traditional cultivation practices will be interrupted and even overridden by new technologies introduced by outsiders.
This hypothetical situation represents a failure of a development project. If someone who is intended to be a beneficiary of a project sees it as a threat rather than an aid it indicates that something is wrong. Such instances can be avoided through safeguard policies.
Related news
-
Ponds of Promise: Unlocking Mandla’s Farm Ponds for Food and Livelihood Security
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program29.09.25-
Adaptation
-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Nutrition
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Ponds as a Lifeline in Mandla Mandla, in central India, is a land of contrasts,…
Read more -
-
Building Bridges for Resilient Landscapes – MFL Collaboration with Zim AEKN
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program29.09.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Gender equality
Reflections on “Deepening the Development of the Zimbabwe Agroecology Knowledge Network (Zim AEKN)…
Read more -
-
Regenerative Agriculture for Healthy Diets and Resilient Food Systems: Better Diets and Nutrition@Stockholm Forum 2025
Esha Sarswat26.09.25-
Environmental health
-
Food security
-
Health
-
Nutrition
-
Nutrition, health & food security
At Stockholm Food Forum 2025, a side event will spotlight how regenerative agriculture, and agroec…
Read more -