Monitoring safeguards at the community-level: are we delivering good or bad change?
- From
-
Published on
02.06.20
- Impact Area

Imagine this scenario: an indigenous people’s organization (IPO) in the Philippines withdrawing its participation in an environmental project. The organization decides to never receive, in whichever form, any assistance from any development organization because members believe that their traditional cultivation practices will be interrupted and even overridden by new technologies introduced by outsiders.
This hypothetical situation represents a failure of a development project. If someone who is intended to be a beneficiary of a project sees it as a threat rather than an aid it indicates that something is wrong. Such instances can be avoided through safeguard policies.
Related news
-
Harnessing digital tools in securing soil health for Africa’s food future
Sehlule Muzata27.06.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health
-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Nairobi, 27 June 2025 (IITA) - As it marks its first anniversary, the Regional Hub…
Read more -
-
Raising productivity and profits, How AgWise is Closing Yield Gaps through AI
Sehlule Muzata20.06.25-
Adaptation
-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health
-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Nairobi, 20 June 2025 (IITA) - Across Africa smallholder farmers battle working with degraded soils,…
Read more -
-
Safeguarding Africa’s Crops: Natural Solutions for Healthier Harvests
Sehlule Muzata11.06.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Nutrition, health & food security
Nairobi, 9 June 2025 (IITA) - Hidden toxins are poisoning Africa’s staple crops and climate…
Read more -