Monitoring safeguards at the community-level: are we delivering good or bad change?
- From
-
Published on
02.06.20
- Impact Area

Imagine this scenario: an indigenous people’s organization (IPO) in the Philippines withdrawing its participation in an environmental project. The organization decides to never receive, in whichever form, any assistance from any development organization because members believe that their traditional cultivation practices will be interrupted and even overridden by new technologies introduced by outsiders.
This hypothetical situation represents a failure of a development project. If someone who is intended to be a beneficiary of a project sees it as a threat rather than an aid it indicates that something is wrong. Such instances can be avoided through safeguard policies.
Related news
-
Inclusion is as big a goal as transformation in Multifunctional Landscapes
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program21.07.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
A Reflection by Sarah Freed , Co-lead of the Area of Work on Gender, Youth…
Read more -
-
CGIAR's Accreditation to UNEA: Strengthening Science for Global Environmental Policy
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program15.07.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
CGIAR, the world’s largest agricultural research partnership, has recently been accredited as an i…
Read more -
-
Multifunctional Landscapes that Incentivize Green Innovations and Improve Livelihoods
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program10.07.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Thriving Landscapes, Vibrant Futures Blog Series #2 Sustainable landscape transformation will not …
Read more -