Monitoring safeguards at the community-level: are we delivering good or bad change?
- From
-
Published on
02.06.20
- Impact Area

Imagine this scenario: an indigenous people’s organization (IPO) in the Philippines withdrawing its participation in an environmental project. The organization decides to never receive, in whichever form, any assistance from any development organization because members believe that their traditional cultivation practices will be interrupted and even overridden by new technologies introduced by outsiders.
This hypothetical situation represents a failure of a development project. If someone who is intended to be a beneficiary of a project sees it as a threat rather than an aid it indicates that something is wrong. Such instances can be avoided through safeguard policies.
Related news
-
Driving policy coherence and strengthening institutions to advance socio-ecological gains
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program14.08.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
Thriving Landscapes, Vibrant Futures Blog 3 of 4 Achieving socio-ecological gains at the landscape l…
Read more -
-
Collaboration between The Netherlands and CGIAR to strengthen the Science Program on Multifunctional Landscapes
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program05.08.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
The Netherlands (NL) - CGIAR research programme contributes to transformational change in agricultu…
Read more -
-
Inclusion is as big a goal as transformation in Multifunctional Landscapes
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program21.07.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
A Reflection by Sarah Freed , Co-lead of the Area of Work on Gender, Youth…
Read more -