Monitoring safeguards at the community-level: are we delivering good or bad change?
- From
-
Published on
02.06.20
- Impact Area
Imagine this scenario: an indigenous people’s organization (IPO) in the Philippines withdrawing its participation in an environmental project. The organization decides to never receive, in whichever form, any assistance from any development organization because members believe that their traditional cultivation practices will be interrupted and even overridden by new technologies introduced by outsiders.
This hypothetical situation represents a failure of a development project. If someone who is intended to be a beneficiary of a project sees it as a threat rather than an aid it indicates that something is wrong. Such instances can be avoided through safeguard policies.
Related news
-
From bottles to solar pumps: how Cocoa farmers in Ghana are innovating to beat water stress
Sehlule Muzata28.10.25-
Environmental health
Across Ghana's cocoa belt, the rhythm of the rains is no longer reliable. Once-predictable wet…
Read more -
-
SOILutions for Security: CGIAR at the 2025 Borlaug Dialogue
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program22.10.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Nutrition
From October 21–23, CGIAR will join global partners in Des Moines, Iowa for the 2025…
Read more -
-
Road to Belém: Scaling biosolutions for soil health and climate action gains momentum ahead of COP30
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program15.10.25-
Adaptation
-
Biodiversity
-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Mitigation
More than 40% of the world’s cultivated land is degraded, affecting more than three billion…
Read more -