Competitive elections are good for democracy – just not every democracy
- From
-
Published on
04.01.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
United States of America
The 2018 U.S. midterm elections were fierce, expensive and full of upsets, with political newcomers ousting long-tenured incumbents and Democrats unseating Republicans to retake the House of Representatives.
That makes them an exemplary democratic exercise from a political science standpoint: American voters booted the congressional representatives who they believed did not fight for their interests.
That’s exactly what elections are meant to do: Hold politicians accountable.
But it doesn’t work that way everywhere. In younger democracies, our research shows, a superheated campaign with numerous candidates may actually impede democracy.
Photo: Marco Dormino/UN
Related news
-
SBI Foundation Joins Hands with UAS Raichur and ICRISAT to Launch “SMART-CROP” Initiative
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)29.10.25-
Big data
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
SBI Foundation, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) arm of the State Bank of India, has…
Read more -
-
Can the Southern Mediterranean Fish Value Chain Thrive Without Women’s Empowerment?
WorldFish22.10.25-
Gender equality
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
When you picture the Mediterranean’s blue economy—encompassing its vibrant fisheries and aquacul…
Read more -
-
World Food Day 16 October: A Hungry World Knows No Borders
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)16.10.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
When crops fail, people move not by choice, but by necessity. As families are displaced…
Read more -