Competitive elections are good for democracy – just not every democracy
- From
-
Published on
04.01.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
United States of America

The 2018 U.S. midterm elections were fierce, expensive and full of upsets, with political newcomers ousting long-tenured incumbents and Democrats unseating Republicans to retake the House of Representatives.
That makes them an exemplary democratic exercise from a political science standpoint: American voters booted the congressional representatives who they believed did not fight for their interests.
That’s exactly what elections are meant to do: Hold politicians accountable.
But it doesn’t work that way everywhere. In younger democracies, our research shows, a superheated campaign with numerous candidates may actually impede democracy.
Photo: Marco Dormino/UN
Related news
-
Rethinking Fertilizer Subsidies in Kenya: Towards More Inclusive and Sustainable Models
Policy Innovations Science Program06.06.25-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
By: Hailemariam Ayalew, Faith Kimaiyo, Sally Kimathi, Michael Keenan, and Clemens Breisinger Fertili…
Read more -
-
Toward a Greener Future: AfricaRice eco-innovations for sustainable rice self-sufficiency in Africa
AfricaRice05.06.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
As Africa strives to nourish its growing population, the challenge extends beyond simply producing m…
Read more -
-
Adding Up Impact: 5 years of Food Systems Transformation. The Alliance 2024 Annual Report
The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)04.06.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
In 2020, Bioversity International and CIAT came together as an Alliance, united by a shared…
Read more -