Competitive elections are good for democracy – just not every democracy
- From
-
Published on
04.01.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
United States of America

The 2018 U.S. midterm elections were fierce, expensive and full of upsets, with political newcomers ousting long-tenured incumbents and Democrats unseating Republicans to retake the House of Representatives.
That makes them an exemplary democratic exercise from a political science standpoint: American voters booted the congressional representatives who they believed did not fight for their interests.
That’s exactly what elections are meant to do: Hold politicians accountable.
But it doesn’t work that way everywhere. In younger democracies, our research shows, a superheated campaign with numerous candidates may actually impede democracy.
Photo: Marco Dormino/UN
Related news
-
From Traditions to Triumph: Premalata’s Success with Solar-Dried Fish in Odisha
WorldFish09.10.25-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Premalata Behera, a 40-year-old member of Maa Women Self Help Group and resident of the…
Read more -
-
ICRISAT Brings Frontier Agricultural Science to the Caribbean in Landmark Partnership
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)03.10.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The world’s premier institute for dryland agriculture and a globally acclaimed research center, th…
Read more -
-
From Door-to-Door Sales to Aquaculture Leader in Zambia.
WorldFish30.09.25-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
In 2003, with just 1,250 kwacha in hand, Cosmas Chachi began walking from house to…
Read more -