Benefit-sharing mechanisms: Barking up the wrong tree?
- Published on
As the quest to protect and restore forests advances and evolves, the age-old question of “who gets what?” seems as pertinent – and complex – as ever.
In recent years, a range of benefit-sharing mechanisms (BSMs) has emerged under REDD+ – a UN-backed program to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and promote restoration – most of which seek to incentivize communities to change their forest management practices in the forests.
“This is not quite as simple as it sounds, however, as communities’ use and management of forests are often not just about economics,” says Grace Wong, former Senior Scientist at the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and current researcher and project lead at the Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Using case studies from Vietnam and Cameroon, Wong co-authored a study published last year, offering a framework for examining how various factors combine to favor or hinder the implementation of policies for sharing benefits from programs like REDD+. Read the full story on Forests News.
Who benefited from the Congo's peace dividend?17.04.19
In several respects, the first decade of the 21st century was a golden opportunity for…Read more
Memorandum of Understanding marks invigorated partnership for CGIAR and Republic of Korea16.04.19
CGIAR and the Rural Development Administration (RDA) of the Republic of Korea, have signed a…Read more
AfricaRice Dr Robert Carsky Award for 201915.04.19
- Food Security
This is an annual award, which was instituted by AfricaRice in honor of the late…Read more