The research-practitioner divide: Why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Gates Foundation, United States of America

Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
Ponds of Promise: Unlocking Mandla’s Farm Ponds for Food and Livelihood Security
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program29.09.25-
Adaptation
-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Nutrition
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Ponds as a Lifeline in Mandla Mandla, in central India, is a land of contrasts,…
Read more -
-
Building Bridges for Resilient Landscapes – MFL Collaboration with Zim AEKN
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program29.09.25-
Biodiversity
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Gender equality
Reflections on “Deepening the Development of the Zimbabwe Agroecology Knowledge Network (Zim AEKN)…
Read more -
-
Empowering Women in Agriculture: AKILIMO's Journey Towards Gender-Responsive Advisory Services
Sehlule Muzata29.09.25-
Adaptation
-
Food security
-
Gender equality
This article summarizes a presentation titled "Insights on Gender Dimensions in the Use and Uptake…
Read more -