The research-practitioner divide: Why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Gates Foundation, United States of America
Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
Australia partners with International Livestock Research Institute to upskill researchers from Africa and Asia
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)13.11.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Australia has joined forces with the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) to support th…
Read more -
-
Next-gen rice lines top check varieties at 7.5 t/ha in ESA
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)11.11.25-
Food security
MOROGORO, Tanzania (8 October 2025) — Elite rice lines are outperforming the current popular varie…
Read more -
-
QTL Profiling Now Live on EBS
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)11.11.25-
Food security
QTL profiling is now integrated into the EBS Platform’s MDA module. Teams across CGIAR research…
Read more -