The research-practitioner divide: Why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Gates Foundation, United States of America

Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
Beyond Emergency Relief: Rethinking Humanitarian Response in Sudan
Ibukun Taiwo11.06.25-
Food security
This post is the second in a two-part series on Sudan’s overlapping food, water, and…
Read more -
-
Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis: The Collapse of Food, Water, and Energy Security
Ibukun Taiwo11.06.25-
Food security
This post is the first in a two-part series on Sudan’s overlapping food, water, and…
Read more -
-
Safeguarding Africa’s Crops: Natural Solutions for Healthier Harvests
Sehlule Muzata11.06.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
-
Nutrition, health & food security
Nairobi, 9 June 2025 (IITA) - Hidden toxins are poisoning Africa’s staple crops and climate…
Read more -