The research-practitioner divide: Why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Gates Foundation, United States of America

Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
DA-BAR and IRRI discuss strategies for advanced rice research and innovation in the Philippines
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)02.05.25-
Food security
Los Baños, Laguna (April 30, 2025) — The Department of Agriculture–Bureau of Agricultural Resea…
Read more -
-
From data to impact: IRRI’s digital vision at CGIAR Science Week 2025
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)28.04.25-
Food security
By Shalini Gakhar As climate pressures and food insecurity continue to challenge global agriculture,…
Read more -
-
IRRI and ICRISAT Set a Joint Vision to demonstrate Integrated Seed Systems for Dryland Farming in South Asia
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)25.04.25-
Food security
CGIAR centers align efforts to drive inclusive, impact-oriented research from 2025 to 2027 New Delhi…
Read more -