The research-practitioner divide: Why we are still optimistic
- From
-
Published on
16.04.19
- Impact Area
-
Funders
Gates Foundation, United States of America

Researchers and development practitioners don’t often team up to co-lead large global projects for a number of reasons. They have different audiences, timelines, and motivations, making collaboration, let alone co-management, challenging. Researchers tend to design and test innovations and work at the global level with a long-term perspective. Practitioners, on the other hand, tend to scale innovations, work on local livelihood improvements, and focus on the present. But even though this type of partnership isn’t very common, we each need the other to be able to solve seemingly intractable global problems like hunger and poverty.
Photo: Marc Charles Wanume
Related news
-
Infinite Leadership and Market Intelligence in CGIAR Breeding
CGIAR Initiative on Market Intelligence20.10.25-
Food security
Matty Demont (IRRI), Berber Kramer (IFPRI), Robert Andrade (Alliance Bioversity-CIAT), Melanie Conno…
Read more -
-
World Food Day 16 October: A Hungry World Knows No Borders
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)16.10.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
When crops fail, people move not by choice, but by necessity. As families are displaced…
Read more -
-
Saving seeds, securing staples: How women are leading seed security in Nepal
International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)15.10.25-
Food security
By Danica Louise C. Sembrano In Nepal, where agriculture supports more than half of the…
Read more -