Nepal’s federal transition: What are the implications for agricultural governance?
- From
-
Published on
13.06.18
- Impact Area

In the wake of violent conflict motivated by grievances over geographically-based inequalities, governments often devolve functions and authority from national to subnational governments. Giving greater decision-making powers to elected local authorities is believed to improve the economic, social and cultural inclusion of those from particular ethnic, linguistic, or religious communities. But devolution can have unexpected implications for the structure and provision of agricultural services, and models of successful adaptation can come from surprising places. (Photo credit: Gert-Jan Stads/IFPRI)
Related news
-
ICRISAT Launches Bold 2025–2030 Strategy to Shape the Future of Agriculture
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)09.09.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
A call to build strategic partnerships for a food-secure and sustainable future for over 2…
Read more -
-
AFSF 2025: Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) – CGIAR Partnership for Impact
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)08.09.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
The Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) and the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Researc…
Read more -
-
South–South Collaboration: Building Resilient Food Systems for the Most Vulnerable
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)06.09.25-
Nutrition, health & food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
Opinion Piece By Dr. Himanshu Pathak, Director General, ICRISAT At the recent Africa Food Systems…
Read more -