The credibility gap: Low trust in government stands in the way of fuel subsidy reform
- Published on
By all accounts, fossil fuel subsidies are disastrous public policy. They encourage us to consume more carbon-intensive fuel and discourage investments in energy efficiency and renewables. They are an incredibly inefficient way to help poor households, as most subsidy benefits are captured by richer, urban households. And they wreak havoc on fiscal resources, sapping around 6.5 percent of global GDP.
Development researchers and practitioners have thus long discussed the benefits that could be created by eliminating these subsidies, freeing up fiscal resources for more worthwhile expenditures like education, infrastructure, and targeted social safety net programs. Yet attempts to shrink subsidies often trigger strong political backlash: The downfall of Suharto, the Saffron Revolution in Myanmar, and Occupy Nigeria have all been linked to attempts to raise fuel prices.
The transformative power of culinary innovation: Changing perspectives on traditional staples16.01.19
Roots, tubers and bananas are often seen as “traditional” foods. Yet their colors and flavors…Read more
PIM Newsletter: October – December 201814.01.19
- Food Security
Collection of news from the Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) program for the last quarter…Read more
Cobs & Spikes podcast: Hello Tractor and agricultural innovation04.01.19
- Food Security
For small-scale farmers, mechanization and other appropriate technologies have a big impact in agric…Read more