Bridging the gap: Overcoming barriers to market intelligence in plant breeding
-
From
CGIAR Initiative on Market Intelligence
-
Published on
31.03.25
- Impact Area

Berber Kramer, Brendan Rice, Carly Trachtman
The integration of market intelligence into plant breeding is essential for aligning genetic innovations with real-world demand. However, a new study highlights persistent barriers that hinder its effective use. Researchers surveyed more than 500 breeding professionals across CGIAR, national agricultural research and extension systems (NARES), and small private-sector breeding enterprises to assess the adoption of market intelligence and identify challenges limiting its impact.
Current state of market intelligence in breeding
While market intelligence processes such as market segmentation and the development of target product profiles (TPPs) have gained traction among breeding teams, their use remains largely informal. Many teams rely on individual insights rather than structured, institutionalized approaches, which can lead to inconsistencies and missed opportunities. The study found that while breeding teams recognize the importance of demand-driven breeding, the integration of market intelligence is often ad hoc and lacks a systematic framework (Figure 1).

Key barriers to adoption
The study identified three major challenges preventing widespread use of market intelligence in breeding decisions:
- Limited access to market intelligence: Funding constraints were the top concern among respondents, particularly within CGIAR and NARES institutions, limiting the systematic collection and analysis of market data. Additionally, a lack of in-house expertise to interpret market information further restricts its application.
- Difficulty translating insights into breeding decisions: Even when market intelligence is available, breeding teams struggle to apply it effectively. Many professionals cited uncertainty about how to weigh different market factors such as farmer preferences, processor needs, and social impact when prioritizing traits.
- Institutional attitudes and incentive misalignment: Breeding teams often lack transdisciplinary collaboration, with social scientists playing a minimal role in decision-making. Furthermore, incentive structures prioritize the number of varieties developed over their adoption or social impact, discouraging a demand-led approach to breeding.
Pathways for Improvement
To address these barriers, the study suggests several key actions:
- Develop standardized tools and protocols to formalize the use of market intelligence in breeding decisions. Platforms such as the CGIAR Global Market Intelligence Platform (GloMIP) can help streamline data collection and integration.
- Enhance training and interdisciplinary collaboration by actively involving social scientists and market experts in breeding teams.
- Align institutional incentives with impact-driven goals, ensuring that breeding professionals are recognized and rewarded for producing varieties that meet market demand and drive social impact.
By overcoming these challenges, the breeding community can better align innovation with market needs, increasing adoption rates and maximizing the impact of new crop varieties.
Further reading: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/168799.
Related news
-
World Food Day 16 October: A Hungry World Knows No Borders
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)16.10.25-
Food security
-
Poverty reduction, livelihoods & jobs
When crops fail, people move not by choice, but by necessity. As families are displaced…
Read more -
-
AI Tool Makes "Invisible Enemy" Visible, Tackling Aflatoxin Risk in Africa's Maize
Sehlule Muzata09.10.25-
Climate adaptation & mitigation
-
Food security
An innovative early warning system powered by artificial intelligence is poised to transform how Afr…
Read more -
-
Advancing public private and people partnership (PPPP) for small scale mechanization in Tunisia: a milestone towards enhanced farm and landscape management.
Multifunctional Landscapes Science Program07.10.25-
Environmental health
-
Environmental health & biodiversity
-
Food security
The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas ICARDA and its national partners…
Read more -