A Global Agricultural Research Partnership

This page contains archived content which could be out of date or no longer accurate. Click the logo above to return to the home page.

 

Spanish French German Russian Japanese Arabic Home About This Site Contact Us Site Map Search
CGIAR: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Nourishing the Future through Scientific Excellence

The Surprising Results of a Global Water Assessment

Ironically, solutions to global water scarcity may lie, not so much in places where this resource is still abundant, but in a region that is relatively dry - the African savannas. This was one of the key findings of the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management for Agriculture, presented by IWMI Director General Frank Rijsberman in a plenary session at World Water Week in Stockholm during late August.

The Assessment, carried out over the last 5 years, brought together more than 700 policy makers, researchers and development specialists from 400 organizations to examine the current status of water availability worldwide, based on the prevailing management practices and policies of the last 50 years. Led by IWMI, the Assessment was co-sponsored by the CGIAR, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and the Convention on Biological Diversity. The final report of the Assessment will be published in November.

The greatest opportunities to deal with water scarcity, according to David Molden, the IWMI scientist who led the research, involve multiple strategies for producing more crops, livestock and fish with water already in use, especially across the African savannas. Most of the world's poor live there and in other parts of the semi-arid tropics, where short dry spells are common and soil fertility is declining.

"Since soils are fragile and rainfall is variable in the savannas, making them more productive is not easy," Rijsberman remarked. "But this year the World Food Prize is going to Brazilian scientists who accomplished just that in their country's vast savanna, called the Cerrados. The same miracle needs to be repeated in Africa."

To transform rainfed agriculture in the African savannas and other semi-arid lands, the Assessment argues, requires investment in low-cost practices such as supplemental irrigation and water harvesting with simple equipment - that is "buckets, not big irrigation systems," as phrased in The Economist magazine, one of many major media that reported on the Assessment.

This transformation must start happening soon for two reasons. First, water scarcity is an impending threat to the livelihoods of the poor. Though natural resource analysts are sometimes accused of exaggerating environmental perils, they rarely understate them. Yet, that is precisely what happened at the start of the new millenium. "Predictions in 2000 forecast that one third of the world's population would suffer the effects of water scarcity by 2025," said Rijsberman. "Our research findings show the situation to be much worse. Already, in 2005 more than a third of the population is affected by water scarcity."

A second source of concern is that the water requirements of agriculture are huge. Up to 70 times more water is needed to grow food than is consumed in drinking and other domestic uses, such as cooking, washing and bathing. In general, it takes about one liter of water to produce each calorie consumed as food. Depending on their diets, humans indirectly consume 2,000 to 5,000 liters of water in their daily meals.

To meet future food requirements, it is especially important that water be used more efficiently in the production of livestock and fish, but oddly their relationship to water management has been neglected. For that reason a workshop held during World Water Week included an ILRI presentation on livestock. In addition, a side event was organized by the World Agroforestry Centre on the importance of trees in water management.

As decision makers struggle to cope with the food-water dilemma, "they will face many difficult choices entailing tradeoffs between urban and agricultural users, food production and the environment, and fishers and farmers," said Molden. "There simply is not enough water to go around."

The Comprehensive Assessment, based on a combination of rigorous science and broad public debate, will at least provide decision makers with a coherent basis for planning and action.

Useful Links