A Global Agricultural Research Partnership

This page contains archived content which could be out of date or no longer accurate. Click the logo above to return to the home page.

 

Spanish French German Russian Japanese Arabic Home About This Site Contact Us Site Map Search
CGIAR: Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Nourishing the Future through Scientific Excellence

A Decidedly Civil Online Dialogue about Partnerships

The December 2006 Story of the Month will run for both December and January. We wish all our readers a peaceful and restful holiday season .

Throughout most of November, a diverse group of researchers and development professionals kept up a continuous stream of informative and constructive messages in the CGIAR's first facilitated online dialogue about its partnerships with civil society organizations, or CSOs. Referred to as a "Virtual Conversation," the dialogue was the positive prelude to a day-long, face-to-face Forum - involving CSOs, Members of the CGIAR, staff of the Centers and Challenge Programs it supports and others - at the CGIAR Annual General Meeting (AGM06) in early December.

Nearly 160 people registered for the conversation, and about 65 posted more than 200 messages in English, French and Spanish. All messages received in the latter two languages were translated into English.

Many of those engaged in the Virtual Conversation had been invited to take part in the Innovation Marketplace, another event at AGM06 designed to allow CSO representatives and their CGIAR partners to share insights and experiences from their collaborative work across the developing world. The Virtual Conversation gave them an opportunity to get to know one another in advance, through virtual introductions, and to exchange information about their work. This encompassed a wide range of topics, such as crop improvement, land management, biodiversity conservation, organic farming, enterprise development, farmer participatory research and the use of new information and communications technologies (ICTs) for rural development.

The Conversation also prompted participants to express views on key issues underlying their partnerships. Much of the discussion centered on the respective roles and responsibilities of CSOs and the CGIAR, and there appeared to be a consensus that these are reasonably clear and complementary. Participants commented that nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) tend to engage in "short-term, focused actions for the benefit of clients," possess "deep knowledge" of local situations and focus mainly on implementation "at the grassroots level." Researchers, they said, whether in academic institutions forming a part of civil society or in CGIAR-supported Centers and Programs, are concerned with "cutting-edge science," "capacity building" and "technology transfer."

A more difficult question, perhaps, is how CSOs and the CGIAR, with their differing roles and responsibilities, can best create partnerships that offer maximum benefit to rural people. Comments on this question highlighted the heterogeneity of the organizations and individuals involved. Some argued that successful partnerships depend mainly on strong relationships between the individuals actually doing the research and development work. Others, in contrast, emphasized the importance of positioning partnerships within strong institutional frameworks through formal agreements between CGIAR and CSO managers. Stronger CSO alliances at the international level, it was suggested, could facilitate the creation of such agreements. Many participants stressed the importance of inclusive, participatory processes at every level - from decisions about project design to interaction with farmers in rural communities.

The discussion of those issues was substantially enriched by the inclusion of seven interviews carried out with CSO representatives and CGIAR Members and leaders. These were readily accessible as audio and text files on the Conversation's Dgroups virtual platform.

Some participants initiated parallel discussions on issues of particular interest to them, such as public-private partnerships and systems for collective marketing of agricultural products.

An online survey was conducted at the conclusion of the Virtual Conversation, with about 30 participants responding. Ninety percent considered it to be excellent or good, and most agreed it had largely accomplished its objective of allowing participants to get to know one another, exchange views and information and prepare for AGM06. These results were reinforced by most respondents' comments, in which they stressed the value of hearing opinions from so many different perspectives.

* The Virtual Conversation on CSO-CGIAR engagement was facilitated by Simone Staiger-Rivas of CIAT and organized by her with assistance from Allison Hewlitt of the Bellanet International Secretariat in Canada; Zineb Benchekchou, Maria Iskandarani, Danielle Lucca, Nathan Russell and Florencia Tateossian at the CGIAR Secretariat; and Enrica Porcari of the CGIAR ICT-KM Program.

The organizers are grateful to all participants for contributing to the dialogue and for taking time to read messages. We would also like to thank the persons listed as follows for agreeing to be interviewed during the Virtual Conversation: Luis Ampuero, President, Fundación Casa de la Agricultura, Bolivia; Ruth Haug, Professor and Department Head, NORAGRIC, Norway; Arun Joshi, Professor, Banaras Hindu University, India; Diemali M'Naouer, Professor, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INAT), Tunisia; Francisco Reifschneider, CGIAR Director; Tom Remington, Agriculture Adviser, Catholic Relief Services (CRS), Kenya; and Francis Seymour, Director General, CIFOR, Indonesia.

photos by Chas Geer

Useful Links