|
Public Policies for Sustainable Development in
Drylands
View as PDF File
The direct, human-induced causes of desertification consist
mainly of destructive land-use practices that diminish biodiversity
and soil quality. These, in turn, are shaped by various indirect
factors, which are closely related to public policies.
For example, since large parts of the dry areas are rangelands
suited more to pastoralism than crop production, policies that
promote a major shift from extensive livestock production to
intensive cropping contribute to desertification. Likewise,
policies on land tenure that limit herders' and farmers'
control over the land they use tend to undercut their incentives to
invest in sustainable land management. Also important are public
policies governing farmers' access to agricultural inputs and
markets, since these are central to the success of any effort to
enhance productivity.
Appropriate changes in public policy can help diminish the
forces that drive desertification. And they can contribute
importantly to the success of strategies aimed at strengthening
food security, reducing poverty and protecting natural resources in
drylands. For example, to create more favorable conditions for
widespread adoption of the various agroforestry options now
available for Africa's drylands, it is urgent that governments
reform outdated forestry codes that have been in place since
colonial times.
Bringing about the necessary changes in policy is by no means
easy, given conflicting pressures from urban, farming and
pastoralist stakeholders. To accomplish this requires sound
research as well as wide dissemination and discussion of results,
which improve our understanding of dryland development. These
measures are critical for raising the quality of the debate about
key issues and for formulating sound policies that are conducive to
sustainable development of drylands.
Research Highlights from Research for Dryland
Development
Improved policies for livestock
management:
One especially important focal point for
policy research is livestock management. In most arid and semi-arid
regions, raising livestock is the predominant rural livelihood, but
it is under constant threat from erratic rainfall. To cope with
this hazard, pastoralists must be able to move their livestock;
reliable access to a wide range of pasturelands is essential for
sustaining traditional livestock systems.
Through a project entitled Property Rights, Risk and Livestock
Development, scientists from the International Food Policy Research
Institute (IFPRI) have examined key policy issues in three
drought-prone countries: Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Niger. The
study determined which forms of property rights permit the mobility
required for raising livestock in drought-prone areas, and it
analyzed the risks involved with these options. The project was
conducted jointly by IFPRI and the International Livestock Research
Institute (ILRI).
Among the study's main conclusions was that cooperation
between herders in resource management can significantly reduce
grazing pressure. Greater cooperation was also shown to result in
smaller herds and increased mobility. These findings offer policy
makers valuable insights that can help them design strategies for
mitigating the impact of drought on livestock production,
particularly in countries that are signatories to the UN Convention
to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). A key aim is to improve herd
mobility and pastureland tenure without prompting dramatic
increases in herd size.
Promoting improved land management:
In
developing improved land management practices, researchers need to
have a good grasp of the various factors that determine whether
individual farmers and entire rural communities will adopt new
practices. IFPRI researchers, in collaboration with ILRI and
national partners, are examining such factors in the highlands of
northern Ethiopia. In connection with this research, they are
comparing alternative investments, policies, and programs in terms
of their impact on agricultural productivity, rural poverty, and
land degradation. As a result, they have found profitable
opportunities for enhancing rural livelihoods, such as tree
planting in degraded areas, improved management of grazing lands
and water harvesting.
Seed relief policies and practices:
Another issue on which CGIAR scientists have generated important
policy-relevant findings is the provision of emergency seed relief
in the wake of natural and human-made crises, such as drought and
civil war. For nearly three decades various CGIAR Centers have
actively supported crisis mitigation efforts, providing seed stocks
from gene banks for massive seed multiplication as well as
information tools to guide the planning and targeting of relief
efforts in crop production and pasturelands. Sometimes, such
support is called for in dry areas, the most recent case being that
of Afghanistan, where eight centers are engaged in a project to
rebuild the country's seed and food systems.
In addition to working with other CGIAR Centers in such
programs, the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
has carried out collaborative research with major aid providers and
on this basis has developed guidelines for more effective seed aid
policies and practices. Likewise, ILRI, in collaboration with the
Animal Agriculture Research Network of the Association for
Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa
(ASARECA), is conducting research to better understand how people
in drylands cope with drought, animal diseases and other stresses
and how their strategies can be strengthened
The Desert Margins Program:
An
important framework for designing policy as well as technological
interventions for dry areas is the CGIAR's Desert Margins
Program. Convened by the International Crops Research Institute for
the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), the program is working with
African partner organizations to halt the degradation of drylands,
with particular emphasis on biodiversity and soils. Toward this end
scientists promote widespread sharing of successful practices and
strengthening of human capacities.
Among the Desert Margin Program's many activities and
achievements, a major one is the creation of decision-support
systems. Many factors, including weather, soils, and management,
determine how a crop will respond to irrigation, fertilizer
application and other practices. In the face of so many
uncertainties, development specialists working in desert-prone
areas need all the help they can get in deciding which crop
management strategies are most suitable in economic and
environmental terms. The Desert Margins Program has organized
workshops on the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology
Transfer (DSSAT), a computer model designed to guide complex
decisions about crop management.
Another novel technique, which helps detect signs of land
degradation, is infrared spectroscopy, developed by the World
Agroforestry Center. Both faster and cheaper than previous tools,
it provides precise and timely recommendations about how to improve
depleted soils, boost crop productivity and measure soil functions,
such as carbon storage and water regulation.
|