|
Local
Stewardship: Best Bet for Saving Java's Remaining Forest
Reserves
Survival of one of Java's last remaining biologically-rich
natural forests will depend as much on incentives for
community stewardship as it does on traditional government
conservation programs, say CGIAR scientists working
in the Indonesian archipelago.
Java's largest remaining block of primary forest, a
700-square kilometer reserve in the Gunung Halimun National
Park, is considered crucial to safeguarding drinking
water supplies in nearby Jakarta.
The
area is under intense pressure from population growth
and efforts to use the land for farming and government
tree plantations.
"The well-being of the Park's biodiversity and
watershed functions depend on the ability of local farmers
to make effective use of state-managed production forests
that surround the reserve," says Meine van Noordwijk,
regional coordinator of the World Agroforestry Centre's
Southeast Asia office.
Research has shown that supporting local people to
plant fruit and other productive tree species in areas
designated as production forests can provide the incentives
villagers lost when access to the land was taken by
the government in the 1970.
"Before the Suharto era, the Park's production
forests were managed reasonably well by local people.
If you look carefully, you can see where they once planted
tea, coffee and fruit trees," he says.
Simple grafting techniques that
increase productivity and profits are needed to sustain
family tree gardens.
Van Noordwijk fears, however, that unless steps are
taken soon to help farmers increase productivity within
the Park's production forest, and provide legal access
to the land so local people have incentives to plant
fruit and timber trees, it's unlikely that the natural
forest reserve can be maintained.
Incentives that lead to good stewardship, Van Noordwijk
adds, are most likely to result from systematic negotiations
between local communities, park managers, and local
government. World Agroforestry Centre is working with
a variety of partners to identify the social and biophysical
causes of conflicts arising over the Park's land tenure
policies.
"Our objective is to use research results to help
facilitate constructive dialogue based upon a scientific
understanding of the problem," Van Noordwijk says.
"For example, by understanding both why and how
farmers plant their trees and manage the soil, we've
been able to calculate the positive impacts that agroforestry
has on the Park's watershed functions."
Non-Native Pine Forests
The situation in the Park is extremely fluid say officials
from the Indonesian Institute for Forest and Environment,
and the NGO Forest Watch International -- both of whom
collaborate closely with World Agroforestry Centre.
Pine tree plantations planted during the Suharto era
and recently transferred to the Park's jurisdiction
have not only displaced native species, but have no
value to local people and are being cut down illegally
by villagers, often in collusion with forest company
guards.
Without an agreement between local communities and
the Park's managers that allows villagers to grow both
food and tree crops, it is only a matter of time before
people start moving from the pine plantations into the
forest reserve.
"There are a number of things that can be done
to reverse the situation," says Tree Domestication
Specialist James Roshetko. "The first is to develop
extension methods and technologies that help farmers
improve the productivity of naturalized and indigenous
tree species. The second is to demonstrate how better
management of trees translates into cash."
Roshetko, who holds a joint appointment with the World
Agroforestry Centre and Winrock International, is testing
extension methods in a project with farmers in Nangung,
a sub-district of some 15,000 households that sits directly
on the park's southern border.
"We look at the commodity chain all the way from
production to the consumer," Roshetko says. "The
objective is to help farmers understand the demands
of the markets, avoid its pitfalls, and capitalize on
its strengths."
Farmers in Nangung say they don't manage their trees
intensively because they lack markets, Roshetko notes,
a notion strongly seconded by local farm leaders. The
project, which is financed by the United States Agency
for International Development, includes training for
farm leaders and NGO staff, identification of priority
tree species, development of profit-boosting management
practices, as well rapid market appraisals.
Deal Halts Evictions
Questions remain, however, as to who actually has the
right to develop the Park's production areas. Farmers
claim, for example, that they are the traditional stewards
of the land and had access before the Suharto regime,
but were never given official title. Government foresters,
however, are skeptical of the claims and are unsure
if local communities can adequately care for the land.
"What we've learned through research is that
the interests of local people and the government's need
to maintain the integrity of the watershed frequently
coincide," says Chip Fay, ICRAF Forest Policy Analyst.
Fay is an expert in "negotiation support."
He helps equip local communities with the information
to find common ground with powerful government agencies.
"One of the principals of negotiation support is
to use science-based research results to eliminate preconceptions
and help the negotiating parties deal with the social
and biological reality on the ground," Fay says.
Studies conducted by World Agroforestry Centre in Lampung
demonstrated that the government's argument that coffee
production leads to sedimentation and silting of nearby
rivers were often without basis. As it turned out, farmers
are willing to grow tree species acceptable to the government,
but would only do so if they had assurances that they
would not be evicted." Fay's research is supported
by the UK's Department for International Development
(DfID). Fay adds that 15 similar efforts are now underway
and that he and his colleagues are working to reduce
the time required to broker an agreement from the 18
months required in the Lampung settlement, to just 2
or 3 months.
"Right now we're collaborating with the Indonesian
Institute for Forest and Environment to document the
history of the land in the Halimun reserve and reassure
Park officials that tree farming is not going to have
an adverse affect on the watershed.
Systematic support for the negotiation process, Fay
adds, begins at the local level to correct misconceptions
and solve problems as close to the source as possible.
Central government should only be encouraged to enter
the process when all other options have been exhausted.
World Agroforestry Centre enriches the dialogue, he
says, by providing research result that target the social
and biological questions being addressed by the negotiators.
Indonesian Forests in Decline
"The need to deepen the science of negotiation
support and to scale-up its application is extremely
urgent, adds Dennis Garrity, Director General, World
Agroforestry Centre.
Garrity, who spent more than a decade working in Indonesia,
notes that Indonesian and World Bank officials recently
reported that the health of the country's forests was
far worse than previously thought and that if deforestation
continues at current rates, Indonesia will soon cease
to be a major supplier of wood products.
|