Robert S. McNamara Seminar
ICARDA entrusted with "Blackbox of Biodiversity"
G–8 Communiqué
Agriculture is Back, but Science Must be Mobilized for Development
AGM 2003 Program Highlights
Cassava Brown Streak Virus
Improving Knowledge Sharing the CGIAR
Genetic Resources: Interim Material Transfer Agreement Approved
Seeds of Life
Cast a Golden Hue
Forest Conference: Balancing Development and Conservation
Biofortification Challenge Program Meeting held in Cali
World Bank/CGIAR Collaboration Gains Momentum
Ensuring Women Farmers Get the Water They Need
Ending the Cycle of Hunger and Poverty in Ethiopia
Mekong Delta: Building fisheries research capacity
CGIAR Science Awards
New Study Assesses CGIAR Priorities and Strategies


July 2003

News and Views From the Chair—CBC

The Committees of Board Chairs (CBC) and Center Directors (CDC) met at ISNAR in May to discuss issues arising from restructuring of the CGIAR System, including ways in which to better coordinate and harmonize Centers’ efforts in areas ranging from the System Office to improved Center collaboration through the Challenge Programs.

A joint statement from the two Committees was produced, tabled and shared with the CGIAR Executive Council in Paris (to view statement, click on http://www.cgiar.org/exco/Final_Joint_CBC-CDC_Statement.pdf).

The main points included:

  • During its meeting in February, the CDC drafted a Code of Conduct for the CDC and the Challenge Programs to help clarify roles and optimize synergy between the Centers.

  • In an effort to streamline work in a more cooperative and collaborative fashion, the Centers agreed to pursue further the idea of a Centers Alliance, to provide the necessary oversight and coordination of Center programs, including the joint work underway within the System Office, as part of the reform program.

  • The Committees stressed the importance of a strong and independent Science Council that could speak to the scientific and programmatic work of the Centers, and emphasized the need for a strong selection process.

  • Discussion also centered on the work of the Executive Council and its committees, particularly the role of the Program Committee and its eventual interaction with the Science Council. The Committees emphasized that ExCo was not created to function as a decision-making body.

  • The potential impact of the Challenge Programs on the work of the Centers (and a lack of new funding) was also discussed. Specifically the potential impact of maintaining Centers’ mandates and reversing the decline in funding levels for core activities was emphasized.

  • The CGIAR Annual General Meeting (AGM) was discussed and a need identified to enhance the dialogue between the membership and the Centers during future meetings. The Centers gave preliminary discussion to the establishment of a scientific symposium (held every one to two years) that could be initiated to ensure maximum exposure to the work and activities of the Centers and its stakeholders.

  • The review processes for the System were addressed on several levels — including preliminary discussion for codes of conduct for operation and management issues, including the benefits of unified program and management reviews. The recent restructuring report for ISNAR received special attention.

  • Public awareness efforts and resource mobilization was also discussed, in follow-up to the external review of the Future Harvest Foundation, with a new strategy for the System going forward to further complement and align the work of the Centers by AGM ‘03.

John Vercoe, Chairman
Committee of Board Chairs (CBC)
and Chairman of the Board, ILRI